How the Financial Industry Destroys Economies

In the shadow of the 2008 financial crisis, as Lehman Brothers’ collapse reverberated through global markets, a stark disparity emerged. In Detroit, abandoned factories stood silent, relics of a once-thriving industrial core, while a few hundred miles away, Wall Street bankers weathered the storm with multi-million-dollar bonuses intact. Having chronicled industries—Halal markets, technology, manufacturing—for over 20 years, I found this dissonance jarring. How had the financial sector, designed to bolster economic growth, become a force that erodes it?

This is not a mere anomaly but a systemic shift, observable from the United States to Greece, Japan to Nigeria. Through a process known as “financialization,” the industry has redirected capital away from productive enterprises—manufacturers, builders, and job creators—toward speculative pursuits that enrich a narrow elite. The result is a hollowing out of economies worldwide, marked by stagnating growth, rising inequality, and diminished opportunities. Drawing on global evidence, this analysis explores how the financial industry undermines economies, offering a sobering assessment of its impact and the urgent need for recalibration.

Related:  How Is Islamic Finance Failing the Real Test?

Historically, finance served a clear purpose. In the mid-20th century, it accounted for just 3% of US GDP in 1950, acting as a conduit for capital to fuel steel mills, automakers, and infrastructure projects that drove postwar prosperity. In Britain, banks supported shipping and industrial expansion; in Japan, they underpinned reconstruction; in Germany, they powered an economic resurgence. The sector’s role was utilitarian—allocating resources to tangible output.

That balance began to unravel in the 1980s. Deregulation swept through advanced economies—ushered in by Reagan in the US and Thatcher in the UK—unleashing financial institutions from prior constraints. The 1999 repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act in the US erased divisions between commercial lending and investment banking, paving the way for speculative excess. Britain’s 1986 “Big Bang” transformed the City of London into a trading powerhouse. Japan’s financial liberalization fueled a property bubble. By 2007, finance’s share of US GDP had risen to 8%, claiming 25% of corporate profits while generating only 4% of jobs—a pattern echoed across developed markets, where its economic weight has doubled since 1980, according to IMF data.

This growth has coincided with a decline in productive capacity. General Motors, once a cornerstone of US industry, exemplifies the shift. By the early 2000s, its financial subsidiary outpaced its automotive operations in earnings, prioritizing lending over production. When the 2008 crisis struck, GM required a $50 billion government bailout to survive, while the banking sector—whose reckless bets precipitated the downturn—distributed $20 billion in bonuses that year. In Japan, the collapse of a speculative bubble in April, 1991 left banks saddled with bad loans, stifling investment and consigning the economy to an average annual GDP growth of 0.5% since 1995, per World Bank figures.

The housing sector provides a glaring case study. In the US, banks transformed mortgages into tradable securities, inflating a bubble that burst in 2008, obliterating $7 trillion in household wealth and triggering 8 million job losses. Major institutions profited by betting against these instruments—one firm alone netted $4 billion—while families faced foreclosure. Spain experienced a parallel fate: its banking sector’s real estate lending frenzy collapsed in 2012, driving unemployment to 25% and leaving behind a sprawl of unoccupied developments. In both instances, finance amplified volatility rather than supporting stable economic foundations.

Corporate priorities have been similarly distorted. Apple, a leader in technology, allocated $90 billion between 2013 and 2015 to repurchase its own shares—enhancing stock prices for investors—rather than expanding innovation. In contrast, Germany’s Siemens benefits from a banking system geared toward industrial lending, maintaining manufacturing’s 20% share of employment against the US’s 8%. In Britain, the retailer Debenhams fell victim to private equity acquisition in 2003; burdened with £1.2 billion in debt, it liquidated by 2020, eliminating 12,000 jobs. The financial sector’s emphasis on short-term returns has supplanted long-term economic value.

Employment has suffered profoundly. In the US, manufacturing’s share of jobs plummeted from 25% in 1970 to 8% by 2015, as capital gravitated toward speculative ventures rather than industrial investment. Research indicates that only 15% of financial flows now support tangible projects, with the remainder absorbed by trading and derivatives. Britain reflects this trend: its finance-dominated economy sustains a prosperous City of London, yet manufacturing constitutes just 8% of employment, exacerbating regional disparities. South Korea stands apart—its banks channel funds to conglomerates like Samsung, preserving industrial employment and supporting GDP growth averaging 3% annually since 2000.

The global financial crisis of 2008 crystallized the sector’s capacity for disruption. In the US, mortgage-backed securities precipitated a $700 billion taxpayer-funded bailout of banks. Iceland’s financial institutions, having borrowed ten times the nation’s GDP, collapsed in 2008, devaluing the krona by 50%. Greece’s economic turmoil traces to opaque financial arrangements in the early 2000s that concealed its debt; when exposed in 2010, it necessitated a €326 billion bailout, slashing pensions and driving youth unemployment to 50%. In each case, financial overreach precipitated national economic distress.

Even resilient economies face long-term erosion. Post-crisis US growth has averaged 1.5% annually—half its postwar norm—while top financial executives amassed half a billion dollars in personal wealth. Japan’s persistent financial stagnation has constrained lending, limiting small business growth; its GDP per capita trails Germany’s by $10,000. Switzerland, despite its banking prominence, required a $60 billion rescue of major institutions in 2008, testing its fiscal stability. The sector’s short-term gains mask broader economic weakening.

Policy frameworks aggravate this imbalance. In the US, tax provisions favor debt over equity—corporations deducted $1 trillion in interest in 2019—encouraging leverage for shareholder dividends rather than workforce expansion. American Airlines, which devoted 96% of its 2019 cash to buybacks, sought a $12 billion bailout in 2020. France’s banking sector, exemplified by BNP Paribas, prioritizes trading over small business lending, contributing to a persistent 7% unemployment rate. Denmark, with stringent capital requirements, directs finance toward productive sectors, sustaining a GDP per capita of $67,000—double Greece’s post-crisis level.

The societal toll is acute. In the US, median household income has remained stagnant since 1999, while finance’s share of national wealth has tripled. The private equity-driven bankruptcy of Toys “R” Us in 2018—after incurring $5 billion in debt—eliminated 22,000 jobs. In Italy, Monte dei Paschi’s collapse in 2013, fueled by speculative investments, eroded savings, prompting pensioner protests. Globally, the wealthiest 1% have doubled their share of income since 1980, as financialization concentrates prosperity.

Emerging economies are not immune. In Nigeria, banks favor foreign exchange trading over agriculture, which constitutes 20% of GDP but receives just 1% of loans, stunting rural development. Kenya’s stock market flourished in the 2010s, yet 36% of its population lives on $1.90 daily. Brazil’s financial sector earned $10 billion from currency swaps in 2015 as its economy contracted by 3%. In each instance, finance bolsters a privileged minority while neglecting broader economic needs.

Potential reforms remain within reach. A financial transaction tax could deter excessive speculation, as demonstrated in Sweden during the 1980s. Fragmenting oversized banks—whose assets now exceed $3 trillion in some US cases—might restore accountability. Germany’s state-supported KfW bank model prioritizes industrial lending over financial engineering. Yet resistance persists: US financial lobbying expenditure reached $1 billion in 2022, dwarfing reform initiatives.

Historical precedent highlights the stakes. Post-1929 regulations in the US fostered four decades of robust growth; post-2008 measures, by contrast, failed to curb banking consolidation. Ireland’s housing market remains strained a decade after its 2010 bailout, with 10% of homes vacant. Greece’s debt stands at 180% of GDP, hampering recovery. The financial sector’s dominance endures, perpetuating economic fragility.

The financial industry undermines economies by diverting resources from production to speculation, a dynamic evident across continents. Detroit’s industrial decline, Spain’s real estate bust, and Japan’s stagnation reflect a consistent pattern: as finance’s economic share doubled since 1980, global GDP growth has decelerated, per World Bank data. This is not a condemnation of finance’s role but a call to realign it with its foundational purpose—supporting the real economy rather than supplanting it. Absent reform, the sector’s next misstep looms, with predictable consequences for nations and their citizens.